Licorice Root
HerbalAlso called · 11 names▾▴
Licorice, liquorice, Liquorice root, sweet root, gan cao, gan zao, Chinese licorice, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Glycyrrhiza inflata, Liquiritiae radix
Herbal supplement (digestive and respiratory symptoms)
Herbs and supplements are not FDA-approved before sale. About these sources
- Tea
- Liquid extract
- Topical
- Food / spice
- Other
Research strength: 3 / 5
Strandberg et al. (2001) found that Finnish women with intake of at least 500 mg glycyrrhizin per week had higher odds of birth before 38 weeks (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.5), but the observational study does not show cause. Strandberg et al. (2002) reported an association with early preterm birth before 34 weeks (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.17 to 8.05), while EMA's 2026 report describes a reanalysis in which the broader under-37-week estimate was not statistically significant. Choi et al. (2013) reported a preliminary stillbirth signal among pregnancies exposed to licorice-containing products; its authors called for larger studies, and EMA's assessment notes exposure-reporting limits. Chen et al. (2026) found no significant overall association with major offspring outcomes in adjusted observational analyses of herbal medicine use; the review described its exploratory Glycyrrhiza and preterm-birth signal as limited and varied. EMA says pregnancy data are limited, cites reproductive effects in animals, and does not recommend use; EMA's assessment and the cited studies do not establish trimester-specific risks or a defined risk for food flavoring or deglycyrrhizinated licorice (DGL). Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- European Medicines Agency: EU herbal monograph on Glycyrrhiza radix, Revision 1EU agencyEuropean guidance
- European Medicines Agency: Assessment report on Glycyrrhiza radix, Revision 1EU agencyEuropean guidance
- Strandberg et al., Am J Epidemiol 2001: Birth outcome in relation to licorice consumption during pregnancyUS government
- Strandberg et al., Am J Epidemiol 2002: Preterm birth and licorice consumption during pregnancyUS government
- Choi et al., Planta Med 2013: Fetal and neonatal outcomes in women reporting ingestion of licorice during pregnancyUS government
- Chen et al., Pharmacol Res 2026: Herbal medicine use during pregnancy systematic review and meta-analysisUS government
Research strength: 3 / 5
Strandberg et al. (2001) found that Finnish women with intake of at least 500 mg glycyrrhizin per week had higher odds of birth before 38 weeks (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.5), but the observational study does not show cause. Strandberg et al. (2002) reported an association with early preterm birth before 34 weeks (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.17 to 8.05), while EMA's 2026 report describes a reanalysis in which the broader under-37-week estimate was not statistically significant. Choi et al. (2013) reported a preliminary stillbirth signal among pregnancies exposed to licorice-containing products; its authors called for larger studies, and EMA's assessment notes exposure-reporting limits. Chen et al. (2026) found no significant overall association with major offspring outcomes in adjusted observational analyses of herbal medicine use; the review described its exploratory Glycyrrhiza and preterm-birth signal as limited and varied. EMA says pregnancy data are limited, cites reproductive effects in animals, and does not recommend use; EMA's assessment and the cited studies do not establish trimester-specific risks or a defined risk for food flavoring or deglycyrrhizinated licorice (DGL). Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- European Medicines Agency: EU herbal monograph on Glycyrrhiza radix, Revision 1EU agencyEuropean guidance
- European Medicines Agency: Assessment report on Glycyrrhiza radix, Revision 1EU agencyEuropean guidance
- Strandberg et al., Am J Epidemiol 2001: Birth outcome in relation to licorice consumption during pregnancyUS government
- Strandberg et al., Am J Epidemiol 2002: Preterm birth and licorice consumption during pregnancyUS government
- Choi et al., Planta Med 2013: Fetal and neonatal outcomes in women reporting ingestion of licorice during pregnancyUS government
- Chen et al., Pharmacol Res 2026: Herbal medicine use during pregnancy systematic review and meta-analysisUS government
Research strength: 3 / 5
Strandberg et al. (2001) found that Finnish women with intake of at least 500 mg glycyrrhizin per week had higher odds of birth before 38 weeks (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.5), but the observational study does not show cause. Strandberg et al. (2002) reported an association with early preterm birth before 34 weeks (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.17 to 8.05), while EMA's 2026 report describes a reanalysis in which the broader under-37-week estimate was not statistically significant. Choi et al. (2013) reported a preliminary stillbirth signal among pregnancies exposed to licorice-containing products; its authors called for larger studies, and EMA's assessment notes exposure-reporting limits. Chen et al. (2026) found no significant overall association with major offspring outcomes in adjusted observational analyses of herbal medicine use; the review described its exploratory Glycyrrhiza and preterm-birth signal as limited and varied. EMA says pregnancy data are limited, cites reproductive effects in animals, and does not recommend use; EMA's assessment and the cited studies do not establish trimester-specific risks or a defined risk for food flavoring or deglycyrrhizinated licorice (DGL). Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- European Medicines Agency: EU herbal monograph on Glycyrrhiza radix, Revision 1EU agencyEuropean guidance
- European Medicines Agency: Assessment report on Glycyrrhiza radix, Revision 1EU agencyEuropean guidance
- Strandberg et al., Am J Epidemiol 2001: Birth outcome in relation to licorice consumption during pregnancyUS government
- Strandberg et al., Am J Epidemiol 2002: Preterm birth and licorice consumption during pregnancyUS government
- Choi et al., Planta Med 2013: Fetal and neonatal outcomes in women reporting ingestion of licorice during pregnancyUS government
- Chen et al., Pharmacol Res 2026: Herbal medicine use during pregnancy systematic review and meta-analysisUS government
Licorice Root — Breastfeeding
Research strength: 2 / 5
LactMed says licorice is sometimes used to raise milk supply, but no valid trial supports a licorice-specific benefit, and the hormone findings do not establish a milk-supply effect. LactMed and EMA report that glycyrrhizin can be detected in some women's milk. EMA does not recommend use while breastfeeding because the evidence is limited, while LactMed says long-term, excessive use should probably be avoided because licorice can raise blood pressure and lower potassium. Li et al. (2026) compared acupressure alone with acupressure plus an eight-herb decoction including licorice; the trial cannot identify licorice's contribution to the milk-production results. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- LactMed: LicoriceUS government
- European Medicines Agency: EU herbal monograph on Glycyrrhiza radix, Revision 1EU agencyEuropean guidance
- Shimada et al., Yakugaku Zasshi 1984: Simultaneous determination of ephedrine and glycyrrhizin in human breast milk
- Li et al., African Journal of Reproductive Health 2026: Herbal galactagogic formula combined with auricular acupressure trialUS government
Pregnancy
Strandberg et al. (2001) studied 1,049 Finnish women with singleton infants. The heavy-exposure group was at least 500 mg glycyrrhizin per week (110 women). Heavy exposure was associated with birth before 38 weeks (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.5); birth weight was not significantly lower. Strandberg et al. (2002) compared 95 Finnish preterm births with 107 controls. Heavy exposure was associated with preterm birth, and the early-preterm subgroup before 34 weeks had an adjusted OR of 3.07 (95% CI 1.17 to 8.05). EMA's 2026 assessment summarizes a later reanalysis of the broader under-37-week endpoint as OR 2.18 (95% CI 0.98 to 4.86, p=0.056), which was not statistically significant. The endpoints differ; the early-preterm estimate should not be replaced by the broader reanalysis or described as a replicated result. Choi et al. (2013) prospectively followed 185 singleton pregnancies exposed to OTC or naturopathic formulations containing G. uralensis and 370 controls. The abstract reports a preliminary stillbirth signal, says other fetal outcomes assessed were similar between groups, and calls for larger studies. EMA's assessment notes recall and exposure-definition limitations. The accessible abstract was read; no causal conclusion is drawn. Räikkönen et al. (2009) studied 321 Finnish children at mean age 8.1 years and reported cognitive and behavioral associations with high maternal glycyrrhizin exposure. Räikkönen et al. (2017) studied 378 children at mean age 12.5 years and reported cognitive, memory, attention, and pubertal associations. Räikkönen et al. (2009) and Räikkönen et al. (2017) report observational associations, which do not establish causation. The 2019 systematic review included 74 articles, 47 herbal products, and 1,067,071 women overall; its 3.07 early-preterm estimate repeats Strandberg et al. (2002), not an independent licorice replication. The 2026 systematic review included 111 herbal-medicine studies and searched through 9 Nov 2024. Adjusted observational analyses did not show significant overall associations with major offspring outcomes, while the exploratory Glycyrrhiza/preterm signal was based on limited, heterogeneous studies.
Breastfeeding
LactMed and EMA report that glycyrrhizin can be detected in the breast milk of some licorice users. EMA's 2026 monograph does not recommend use while breastfeeding; LactMed's advice is narrower for long-term, excessive use because of maternal high blood pressure, low potassium, and adrenal-hormone changes. The 1984 Shimada primary abstract describes an HPLC method for ephedrine and glycyrrhizin and says it was applied to milk from patients receiving Kakkonto extract granules, a multi-herb product. The abstract does not report sample count or measured values. No milk concentrations are provided here. The 2026 randomized trial enrolled 104 women with postpartum low milk supply and compared auricular acupressure alone (52 women) with acupressure plus an eight-herb decoction (52 women) for two weeks. LactMed identifies licorice as one ingredient. The trial's combination design cannot identify licorice's contribution to the milk-production results. LactMed reports that licorice-alone trials do not support a milk-supply benefit; prolactin findings are not a direct measure of milk output.
Licorice root from Glycyrrhiza species contains glycyrrhizin, also called glycyrrhizic acid. Glycyrrhizin is metabolized to glycyrrhetinic acid. Deglycyrrhizinated licorice (DGL) has had glycyrrhizin removed, so DGL and glycyrrhizin-containing root are different exposures. The pregnancy studies measured reported glycyrrhizin intake from licorice consumption or studied multi-ingredient products containing G. uralensis; they do not establish the amount of glycyrrhizin in a particular food, tea, extract, or supplement.
What was tested
Pregnancy evidence includes observational reports on Finnish licorice consumption with estimated glycyrrhizin intake, studies of offspring from those pregnancies, and a Korean cohort exposed to OTC or naturopathic formulations containing G. uralensis. These studies did not provide trimester-specific comparisons. The 2019 review's licorice estimate repeats a Finnish study; the 2026 review includes a wider set of herbal products and identifies only a limited exploratory Glycyrrhiza signal. Breastfeeding evidence includes a milk assay involving Kakkonto, a multi-herb product, and a 2026 trial of an eight-herb decoction combined with acupressure. Neither lactation study isolates licorice as the only exposure.
Pregnancy evidence for earlier birth and other offspring outcomes
- Source A says
- The Finnish cohort and case-control studies report associations between heavy glycyrrhizin exposure and earlier birth. Choi et al. reported a preliminary stillbirth signal in a cohort exposed to licorice-containing formulations. EMA's monograph does not recommend use during pregnancy. (Strandberg et al., Am J Epidemiol 2001: Birth outcome in relation to licorice consumption during pregnancy, Strandberg et al., Am J Epidemiol 2002: Preterm birth and licorice consumption during pregnancy, Choi et al., Planta Med 2013: Fetal and neonatal outcomes in women reporting ingestion of licorice during pregnancy, European Medicines Agency: EU herbal monograph on Glycyrrhiza glabra, G. inflata, and G. uralensis radix, Revision 1)
- Source B says
- EMA's assessment summarizes a reanalysis in which the broader under-37-week estimate was not statistically significant. The 2026 herbal review found no significant overall association in adjusted observational analyses and describes the Glycyrrhiza/preterm signal as exploratory and based on limited, varied studies. (European Medicines Agency: Assessment report on Glycyrrhiza radix, Revision 1, Chen et al., Pharmacol Res 2026: Benefits and risks of herbal medicine use during pregnancy on offspring outcomes)
- Why they differ
- The studies use different birth endpoints and exposure measures. The findings are observational, and the Korean study relied on reported use of multi-ingredient products. The 2026 review searched studies published through 9 Nov 2024 and analyzed herbal medicines broadly, so its overall result is not a direct null test of one licorice dose or preparation.
- What the evidence shows overall
- The human evidence contains risk signals but does not establish causation or a trimester-specific effect. EMA's precaution remains relevant, while the 2026 review and reanalysis limit how strongly the earlier associations can be generalized.
Breastfeeding recommendation and evidence gap
- Source A says
- EMA does not recommend use during breastfeeding and reports glycyrrhizin in some women's milk. (European Medicines Agency: EU herbal monograph on Glycyrrhiza glabra, G. inflata, and G. uralensis radix, Revision 1)
- Source B says
- LactMed narrows its caution to long-term, excessive use because of maternal effects. It reports no scientifically valid licorice-specific clinical trials for increasing milk supply. (LactMed: Licorice)
- Why they differ
- EMA's recommendation is broader; LactMed focuses its avoidance language on prolonged or excessive maternal exposure. The 2026 lactation trial also tested a multi-herb formula with acupressure rather than licorice alone.
- Other sources
- The 1984 primary abstract describes a milk assay applied to Kakkonto users, while the 2026 trial compares acupressure alone with acupressure plus an eight-herb decoction that includes licorice. (Shimada et al., Yakugaku Zasshi 1984: Simultaneous determination of ephedrine and glycyrrhizin in human breast milk, Li et al., African Journal of Reproductive Health 2026: Effect of a herbal galactagogic formula combined with auricular acupressure)
- What the evidence shows overall
- The available data do not establish a licorice-specific milk-supply effect. EMA's broader advice and LactMed's caution for long-term, excessive use differ in scope, so the overall evidence rating remains insufficient rather than avoid.
Not enough research found yet.
General research, not specific to pregnancy.
EMA describes fluid retention, low potassium, high blood pressure, and heart rhythm disorders with medicinal licorice, especially with higher exposure. NCCIH also reports serious effects with large or long-term intake and reports interactions with corticosteroids.
- EMA lists fluid retention, low potassium, high blood pressure, and heart rhythm disorders among effects of medicinal licorice, and advises caution with medicines that can worsen electrolyte imbalance. (European Medicines Agency: EU herbal monograph on Glycyrrhiza glabra, G. inflata, and G. uralensis radix, Revision 1)
- NCCIH reports that glycyrrhizin can cause serious effects such as irregular heartbeat, especially with large or long-term intake, and notes reported interactions with corticosteroids. (National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health: Licorice Root)
- LactMed: LicoriceUS governmentSecondaryPage dated 2026-06-15
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health: Licorice RootUS governmentSecondary
- European Medicines Agency: EU herbal monograph on Glycyrrhiza glabra, G. inflata, and G. uralensis radix, Revision 1EU agencySecondaryPage dated 2026-03-04Independent checkEuropean guidance
- European Medicines Agency: Assessment report on Glycyrrhiza radix, Revision 1EU agencySecondaryPage dated 2026-03-04Independent checkEuropean guidance
- Strandberg et al., Am J Epidemiol 2001: Birth outcome in relation to licorice consumption during pregnancyUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Strandberg et al., Am J Epidemiol 2002: Preterm birth and licorice consumption during pregnancyUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Choi et al., Planta Med 2013: Fetal and neonatal outcomes in women reporting ingestion of licorice during pregnancyUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Räikkönen et al., Am J Epidemiol 2009: Maternal licorice consumption and detrimental cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in childrenUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Räikkönen et al., Am J Epidemiol 2017: Maternal licorice consumption during pregnancy and pubertal, cognitive, and psychiatric outcomes in childrenUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Muñoz Balbontín et al., Obstet Gynecol 2019: Herbal medicinal product use during pregnancy and the postnatal period systematic reviewUS governmentPrimary
- Chen et al., Pharmacol Res 2026: Benefits and risks of herbal medicine use during pregnancy on offspring outcomesUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Shimada et al., Yakugaku Zasshi 1984: Simultaneous determination of ephedrine and glycyrrhizin in human breast milkPrimaryIndependent check
- Li et al., African Journal of Reproductive Health 2026: Effect of a herbal galactagogic formula combined with auricular acupressureUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
Last reviewed 2026-10-16
Independent check 2026-10-16
Not yet clinician-reviewed
Ask your provider about your situation.
Related
- Ginger
- Marshmallow Root
- Slippery Elm