Valacyclovir
MedicationValtrex
Antiviral
Research strength: 3 / 5
MotherToBaby reports no increased chance of miscarriage or birth defects with acyclovir or valacyclovir, including in over 200 first-trimester valacyclovir exposures. Pasternak and Hviid's Danish study found no increase in major birth defects overall, but had only 229 first-trimester valacyclovir exposures. Ahrens et al. reported a possible link between early antiviral use and gastroschisis, a rare abdominal-wall opening; the study could not separate medicine effects from herpes infection. A 2026 review found no consistent birth-defect signal across antiviral studies, but most evidence was observational and of moderate-to-low certainty; the Valtrex label says data are too small for firm conclusions and insufficient for miscarriage and other pregnancy outcomes. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- MotherToBaby: Acyclovir/Valacyclovir fact sheetTeratology service
- DailyMed: Valtrex US prescribing informationDrug company label
- Pasternak and Hviid 2010 Danish cohortUS government
- Ahrens et al. 2013 NBDPS case-control studyUS government
- Sleman et al. 2026 pregnancy antiviral umbrella reviewUS government
- CDC STI Treatment Guidelines: Genital herpesUS government
Research strength: 3 / 5
The Valtrex pregnancy registry recorded 31 second-trimester exposures, and the label says the studies are too small to support firm conclusions about major birth defects. MotherToBaby reports no overall increase in birth defects in studies of acyclovir and valacyclovir, but its fact sheet does not give a separate second-trimester estimate. The label says information on miscarriage and other maternal or fetal outcomes is insufficient. The BASHH/RCOG guideline lists valacyclovir as a treatment option for genital herpes in pregnancy and notes it is not licensed for pregnancy in the UK. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- DailyMed: Valtrex US prescribing informationDrug company label
- MotherToBaby: Acyclovir/Valacyclovir fact sheetTeratology service
- BASHH/RCOG 2024 pregnancy and neonatal HSV guideline
- Zammarchi et al. 2026 Italian CMV cohortUS government
Research strength: 3 / 5
The Valtrex registry recorded 52 third-trimester exposures; the label says these data do not support firm conclusions about birth-defect risk and do not answer miscarriage or other pregnancy outcomes. CDC lists suppression from 36 weeks for recurrent genital herpes, while the 2024 BASHH/RCOG guideline says 32 weeks, or 22 weeks when early delivery risk is high. In a randomized trial, Sheffield et al. found no newborn HSV cases among 338 evaluated pregnancies after valacyclovir or placebo was assigned at 36 weeks. Pinninti et al. described eight newborn HSV cases after maternal acyclovir suppression, and BASHH/RCOG says available studies have not established prevention; CDC also notes that acquiring genital herpes near delivery itself raises newborn infection risk. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- DailyMed: Valtrex US prescribing informationDrug company label
- CDC STI Treatment Guidelines: Genital herpesUS government
- BASHH/RCOG 2024 pregnancy and neonatal HSV guideline
- Sheffield et al. 2006 randomized valacyclovir suppression trialUS government
- Pinninti et al. 2012 neonatal HSV case seriesUS government
- Brown et al. 2003 prospective neonatal HSV cohortUS government
Valacyclovir — Breastfeeding
Research strength: 4 / 5
LactMed says valacyclovir becomes acyclovir, and the amount passed in milk is less than 1% of a typical infant dose; it says no special precautions are needed. NHS SPS also says only small amounts pass into milk, but advises watching full-term, healthy infants for sleepiness, irritability, rash, vomiting, or diarrhea as a precaution. The FDA label says there are no data on effects in breastfed children, while Sheffield et al.'s milk-level study measured five nursing mothers and estimated an infant dose about 2% of therapeutic newborn dosing. Kallia et al.'s 2025 review found 12 studies but said most focused on mothers with HIV, limiting use of those findings for other families. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- LactMed: ValacyclovirUS government
- NHS SPS: Treating herpes virus infections during breastfeedingUK government
- DailyMed: Valtrex US prescribing informationDrug company label
- Sheffield et al. 2002 human milk-level studyUS government
- Drake et al. 2012 infant outcome trialUS government
- Kallia et al. 2025 lactation systematic reviewUS government
- BASHH/RCOG 2024 pregnancy and neonatal HSV guideline
Pregnancy
Human pregnancy evidence includes both acyclovir and valacyclovir, but the amount of direct valacyclovir evidence is smaller. The historical Valtrex pregnancy registry recorded 111 exposed infants and fetuses: 28 first-trimester, 31 second-trimester, and 52 third-trimester exposures. It reported major birth defects in 4.5% of first-trimester exposures (95% CI 0.24% to 24.9%) and 3.9% across all trimesters (95% CI 1.3% to 10.7%); the label says the sample is too small for firm conclusions. Pasternak and Hviid's 2010 Danish cohort covered 837,795 live-born infants. Among 229 with first-trimester valacyclovir exposure, 7 had a major birth defect; the adjusted POR was 1.21 (95% CI 0.56 to 2.62). The cohort found no association between first-trimester acyclovir or valacyclovir and major birth defects overall, but the VCV estimate is imprecise and the live-birth design cannot answer miscarriage risk. Ahrens et al.'s 2013 NBDPS case-control study found that 10 of 941 gastroschisis cases and 27 of 8,339 controls reported early antiherpetic use. The adjusted odds ratio was 4.7 among women with self-reported genital herpes and 4.7 among women without it, compared with women without medication use or herpes; herpes without medication was also associated with gastroschisis (OR 3.0). The study raises a possible rare-defect signal but cannot separate the medication from the underlying infection, and it combined acyclovir, valacyclovir, and famciclovir. A 2026 umbrella review included 43 systematic reviews and 27 pregnancy cohorts, including acyclovir/valacyclovir for HSV and VZV; it reported no consistent teratogenicity signal across antiviral therapies but noted that most evidence was observational with moderate-to-low certainty. Sheffield et al.'s 2006 randomized trial assigned 350 pregnant women with a genital-herpes history to valacyclovir or placebo from 36 weeks; 338 were evaluated and no infant was diagnosed with neonatal HSV. Pinninti et al.'s 2012 case series described 8 infants with neonatal HSV after maternal suppressive acyclovir; 7 had perinatal transmission, including 5 whose mothers received suppression until delivery. The case series has no comparison group or denominator, so it cannot estimate how often disease occurs or whether suppression changes that chance. MotherToBaby reports no increased miscarriage chance and no overall increase in birth defects, while the Valtrex label says miscarriage and other maternal or fetal outcome data are insufficient. A 2026 Italian observational cohort studied primary maternal CMV infection, not routine HSV treatment: 832 women and 842 fetuses were included, with 588 fetuses treated with VCV. Miscarriages were 4/555 in the treated group and 4/250 in the untreated group (adjusted OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.80; p=0.24), which was not statistically significant and does not establish a causal benefit. A 2023 CMV meta-analysis included 8 studies and 620 women and rated evidence for reduced congenital CMV infection and adverse perinatal outcomes very low. Animal data are separate from human findings: the label reports no adverse embryo-fetal effects at exposures up to about 4 times human exposure in rats and 7 times in rabbits, but early embryo death, reduced fetal growth, and skeletal variations in rats at about 6 times human exposure with maternal adverse effects.
Breastfeeding
Valacyclovir is rapidly converted to acyclovir, which is measured in milk. LactMed calculates that maternal dosing of 500 mg twice daily provides about 0.6 mg/kg/day of acyclovir to a breastfed child, less than 1% of a typical infant dose. Sheffield et al. (2002) gave 500 mg twice daily for 7 days to 5 breastfeeding mothers; the amount in milk was about 2% of therapeutic newborn dosing. Drake et al. (2012) randomized 148 Kenyan pregnant women with HIV-1 and HSV-2 to valacyclovir or placebo; 146 mother-infant pairs were followed postpartum. Mothers and infants also received antiretroviral prophylaxis, and the trial found no increase in infant or maternal adverse events, but this population and co-treatment limit generalization. Kallia et al.'s 2025 systematic review included 12 studies: 3 randomized trials, 5 observational studies, and 4 case reports. The authors noted that most studies focused on HIV co-infection. The Valtrex label says direct effects on breastfed children and milk production have not been studied. LactMed says no special precautions are required; NHS SPS recommends precautionary monitoring for drowsiness, irritability, rash, vomiting, and diarrhea in full-term, healthy infants. These are different precaution approaches, not evidence of established infant harm.
Valacyclovir is an oral antiviral that the body rapidly converts to acyclovir. The Valtrex label lists treatment and suppression of genital herpes, shingles, cold sores, and chickenpox for specific ages and conditions. The pregnancy evidence mostly concerns treatment of herpes simplex or CMV; those indications and doses are not interchangeable.
What was tested
Pregnancy evidence includes a historical registry of 111 valacyclovir exposures, a Danish cohort of 837,795 live births with 229 first-trimester VCV exposures, a case-control study of early antiherpetic use and gastroschisis with 941 cases and 8,339 controls, and a 2026 umbrella review of 43 systematic reviews and 27 pregnancy cohorts. Late-pregnancy suppression evidence includes a randomized valacyclovir trial with 338 evaluated participants and a separate eight-infant case series following maternal acyclovir suppression; neither can establish prevention of the rare newborn outcome. Newer CMV studies evaluate maternal primary CMV infection, often with higher doses, rather than routine HSV treatment. Breastfeeding evidence includes a milk-level study in 5 mothers, a randomized trial with 146 mother-infant pairs in an HIV/HSV-2 and antiretroviral-prophylaxis setting, and a 2025 review of 12 studies, many involving HIV co-infection. The evidence is limited for trimester-specific VCV outcomes and for infant outcomes outside those study populations.
Broad major birth-defect findings and a possible rare gastroschisis signal
- Source A says
- Ahrens et al. and CDC describe a possible association between early use of antiherpetic medicines and gastroschisis, a rare abdominal-wall defect. The study could not separate medicine use from the underlying genital herpes infection. (Ahrens et al. 2013 NBDPS case-control study, CDC STI Treatment Guidelines: Genital herpes)
- Source B says
- Pasternak and Hviid found no association between first-trimester acyclovir or valacyclovir and major birth defects overall; MotherToBaby and BASHH/RCOG summarize broad data without an overall major-defect increase. (Pasternak and Hviid 2010 Danish cohort, MotherToBaby: Acyclovir/Valacyclovir fact sheet, BASHH/RCOG 2024 pregnancy and neonatal HSV guideline)
- Why they differ
- Ahrens examined one rare defect and grouped three antivirals, with small exposed counts and possible infection confounding. The Danish cohort examined all major defects overall and had only 229 first-trimester valacyclovir exposures. These designs do not answer the same question.
- What the evidence shows overall
- The NBDPS finding is a signal, not proof that valacyclovir caused gastroschisis. The broad cohort did not find an overall association, but the small valacyclovir group cannot rule out every rare defect. The entry presents both findings and keeps the guidance rating.
When suppressive therapy begins in late pregnancy
- Source A says
- CDC lists a 36-week start for suppression of recurrent genital herpes in pregnancy. (CDC STI Treatment Guidelines: Genital herpes)
- Source B says
- The 2024 BASHH/RCOG guideline says suppression is routinely offered from 32 weeks, or from 22 weeks when preterm delivery risk is high. (BASHH/RCOG 2024 pregnancy and neonatal HSV guideline)
- Why they differ
- The UK guideline is a 2024 update that moved routine suppression earlier than the CDC guideline's 36-week regimen. These are different national recommendations and timing windows, not evidence of a medicine-caused fetal effect.
- What the evidence shows overall
- Both sources discuss managing genital herpes near delivery. The timing difference is included for context; it does not by itself change the rating. BASHH/RCOG also says suppression has not been studied enough to show that it prevents newborn HSV disease.
Precautionary infant monitoring during breastfeeding
- Source A says
- LactMed says milk exposure is below 1% of a typical infant dose and no special precautions are required; BASHH/RCOG reports that milk exposure is below 1% of a therapeutic infant dose and has not been shown to harm infants. (LactMed: Valacyclovir, BASHH/RCOG 2024 pregnancy and neonatal HSV guideline)
- Source B says
- NHS SPS advises precautionary monitoring of full-term, healthy infants for drowsiness, irritability, skin rash, vomiting, and diarrhea. The FDA-approved label says direct effects on breastfed children have not been studied. (NHS SPS: Treating herpes virus infections during breastfeeding, DailyMed: Valtrex US prescribing information, GSK)
- Why they differ
- LactMed emphasizes low estimated exposure and available follow-up; NHS SPS adds precautionary monitoring in the setting of limited published evidence. The label describes the infant-outcome data gap but does not claim that harm is established.
- What the evidence shows overall
- The available evidence supports keeping breastfeeding compatible while showing the monitoring difference. Under R1, one agency's precaution without an established harm does not by itself change the rating.
- CDC lists valacyclovir 500 mg by mouth twice daily from 36 weeks for suppression of recurrent genital herpes during pregnancy. (CDC STI Treatment Guidelines: Genital herpes)
- The 2024 BASHH/RCOG guideline lists valacyclovir as an alternative for genital herpes treatment or suppression in pregnancy. It lists suppression from 32 weeks, or from 22 weeks when preterm delivery risk is high, and says prevention of newborn HSV disease has not been demonstrated. (BASHH/RCOG 2024 pregnancy and neonatal HSV guideline)
- NHS SPS says acyclovir or valacyclovir can be used during breastfeeding for full-term, healthy infants and advises precautionary monitoring for drowsiness, irritability, skin rash, vomiting, and diarrhea. (NHS SPS: Treating herpes virus infections during breastfeeding)
General research, not specific to pregnancy.
The Valtrex label warns of acute kidney failure and central nervous system reactions in certain situations. It also reports severe skin reactions after marketing and TTP/HUS in specific high-dose settings, and it contraindicates use after a clinically significant hypersensitivity reaction to valacyclovir, acyclovir, or a formulation component. EMA required product information to include kidney tubulointerstitial nephritis at a frequency that is not known. In 2024, EMA found evidence insufficient to establish a causal link with acute hepatitis for an immediate label update, but asked manufacturers to continue monitoring possible severe liver events.
- The Valtrex label says acute kidney failure may occur in older adults, people with kidney disease who receive higher-than-recommended doses, people taking other kidney-affecting medicines, or people who are not well hydrated. (DailyMed: Valtrex US prescribing information, GSK)
- The Valtrex label warns that central nervous system reactions, including agitation, hallucinations, confusion, and encephalopathy, may occur, especially with higher-than-recommended doses in people with kidney impairment. (DailyMed: Valtrex US prescribing information, GSK)
- The Valtrex label states: "VALTREX is contraindicated in patients who have had a demonstrated clinically significant hypersensitivity reaction [e.g., anaphylaxis, severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs)] to valacyclovir, acyclovir, or any component of the formulation." (DailyMed: Valtrex US prescribing information, GSK)
- The label reports that TTP/HUS occurred in people with advanced HIV-1 or bone-marrow or kidney transplants who received 8 grams per day in clinical trials. (DailyMed: Valtrex US prescribing information, GSK)
- The label reports postmarketing severe skin reactions, including DRESS and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. (DailyMed: Valtrex US prescribing information, GSK)
- In 2022, EMA required adding tubulointerstitial nephritis, an inflammation of the kidneys, to valacyclovir product information at a frequency not known. (EMA valaciclovir PSUSA position, 2022)
- In June 2024, PRAC found evidence insufficient to establish a causal relationship between valacyclovir and acute hepatitis for a product-information update at that time. It asked manufacturers to keep monitoring acute hepatitis and to include drug-related severe hepatic disorders as an important potential risk. (EMA PRAC June 2024 minutes: valaciclovir acute-hepatitis signal)
- MotherToBaby: Acyclovir/Valacyclovir fact sheetTeratology serviceSecondary
- DailyMed: Valtrex US prescribing information, GSKDrug company labelTertiaryPage dated 2025-11-12
- Pasternak and Hviid 2010 Danish cohortUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Ahrens et al. 2013 NBDPS case-control studyUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- CDC STI Treatment Guidelines: Genital herpesUS governmentSecondaryPage dated 2022-09-21Independent check
- BASHH/RCOG 2024 pregnancy and neonatal HSV guidelineSecondaryPage dated 2024-09-30Independent check
- Zammarchi et al. 2026 Italian CMV cohortUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- D'Antonio et al. 2023 CMV systematic review and meta-analysisUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Sleman et al. 2026 pregnancy antiviral umbrella reviewUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- LactMed: ValacyclovirUS governmentSecondaryPage dated 2026-01-15
- NHS SPS: Treating herpes virus infections during breastfeedingUK governmentSecondaryPage dated 2024-01-12Independent check
- Sheffield et al. 2002 human milk-level studyUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Drake et al. 2012 infant outcome trialUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Kallia et al. 2025 lactation systematic reviewUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Sheffield et al. 2006 randomized valacyclovir suppression trialUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Pinninti et al. 2012 neonatal HSV case seriesUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Brown et al. 2003 prospective neonatal HSV cohortUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- EMA valaciclovir PSUSA position, 2022EU agencySecondaryIndependent checkEuropean guidance
- EMA PRAC June 2024 minutes: valaciclovir acute-hepatitis signalEU agencySecondaryPage dated 2024-08-08Independent checkEuropean guidance
Last reviewed 2026-10-16
Independent check 2026-10-16
Not yet clinician-reviewed
Ask your provider about your situation.
Similar medications
- Acyclovir