SafeMomma

← Our sources

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)

Professional society

A private U.S. professional association for obstetricians and gynecologists. · United States

Visit the source site · Audited 2026-10-14

Who pays for it

ACOG's 2024 tax return reports $63,505,977 in revenue, including $13,263,216 in contributions, or 20.9%; donor sectors are not identified, and income from its advertised promotions was not verified.

Status: Supporting

ACOG is clinician-led and publishes evidence-graded guidance, but it also sells advertising and the full methods for some guidance were not available for review. SafeMomma treats it as supporting evidence, not an independent check.

How SafeMomma uses it

SafeMomma cites an applicable ACOG document as supporting evidence and checks consequential claims against a source with different owners and funding.

The audit

Who controls it
ACOG guidance is developed by clinical committees, volunteer clinicians, staff, and, for some documents, methodologists and outside experts. The reviewed editorial records named no political appointee or industry representative, but this was not a review of every author or document.
Money
ACOG's return for the year ending December 2024 reports $63,505,977 in revenue and $13,263,216 in contributions. The return does not identify donor sectors; the College's advertising, newsletter promotion, and mailing-list income was not separately verified, and the ACOG Foundation is a separate entity.
Conflict rules
ACOG publicly refers to a conflict-of-interest disclosure policy, and its Ethics Committee says statement authors filed disclosures and potential conflicts were managed under policy. The full Clinical Consensus methods page did not render, so detailed rules and author-by-author records were not verified.
Method
ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 8 used a planned protocol, a broad librarian search, study-quality review, and GRADE, a system for rating evidence and recommendations. These details apply to that guideline example, not automatically to every ACOG document; the Clinical Consensus method details were not accessible.
Dates on its pages
ACOG says originating committees review clinical guidance every 24 to 36 months, but that does not show each item was updated on time; its HIV FAQ displayed a June 2026 update date and an April 2025 review date.
Political exposure
In September 2025, after FDA began an acetaminophen label-change process, ACOG reaffirmed judicious use and said the evidence did not support a causal link with neurodevelopmental disorders. The reviewed record showed no official order to rewrite ACOG guidance, but the historical scan was not exhaustive.
Money exposure
By the October 14, 2026 audit cutoff, ACOG offered advertising, newsletter promotions, and mailing-list rental, with an advertising policy separating ads from editorial content and barring implied endorsement. No public dollar amount for College advertising, sponsorship, or company support was verified, and no specific recommendation was shown to have changed because of a sponsor.
Track record
In five backtests, ACOG's 2020 antiseizure-medicine opinion gave broad class-level risk information, not a valproate-specific absolute risk or a topiramate-specific assessment. Its 2021 postpartum pain guidance allowed selected short-term codeine use and was reaffirmed in 2025; its nausea FAQ acknowledged uncertainty without effect estimates. The 2025 acetaminophen advisory was first captured three days after FDA's announcement, but its exact publication lag is unknown; no source-specific evidence of financial or political control was found in the tests.

Where this comes from

Incentive exposure describes pressure from money or politics, not whether the source is right. Funding alone does not show influence.

← Back to Our sources