FDA
US governmentThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a federal agency; FDA and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) jointly develop the fish advice. · United States
Visit the source site · Audited 2026-10-14
Who pays for it
FDA's FY2025 PDUFA human-drug-review program had $1.759 billion in obligations, including $1.360 billion (77%) from pooled user fees and $399.0 million (23%) from appropriations; this is not FDA's total budget, and no separate budget for the FDA/EPA fish advice was identified.
Status: Labeled
FDA is the primary source for its own notices and fish advice, but its audit rates incentive exposure as medium and identifies leadership exposure and pooled review fees. SafeMomma shows its government label and checks contested clinical interpretations against another source.
How SafeMomma uses it
SafeMomma cites FDA for its own notices and published fish advice, with a visible government label and a second source for contested clinical claims.
The audit
- Who controls it
- FDA issues its communications, which are subject to agency leadership; FDA and EPA jointly develop the fish advice. FDA's 2025 acetaminophen physician notice was signed by Commissioner Makary.
- Money
- FDA's FY2025 Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) program had $1.458 billion in net collections, $1.360 billion in user-fee obligations, and $1.759 billion in total obligations, of which 77% came from user fees and 23% from appropriations. These figures apply to the human-drug-review program, not FDA as a whole; no separate page-level budget for fish advice was identified.
- Conflict rules
- The reviewed press releases and advice pages do not show author-by-author financial disclosures. FDA is subject to government ethics rules, while the fish method describes technical inputs and external review; no company sponsor controlling that advice was identified.
- Method
- FDA's September 2025 acetaminophen release discusses reported associations, contrary studies, and the fact that causation has not been established, but it does not present a new systematic review or evidence-grade table. The FDA/EPA fish method publishes its mercury equation, reference dose, uncertainty factor, data sources, fish categories, and confidence ranges, and underwent external review.
- Dates on its pages
- The FDA acetaminophen safety page is dated August 14, 2025, the announcement and physician notice September 22, 2025, and the fish chart October 2021, while the technical page includes entries through June 2024.
- Political exposure
- Leadership changed from Commissioner Makary (March 25, 2025 to May 13, 2026) to Acting Commissioner Diamantas beginning May 15, 2026. On September 22, 2025 FDA started an acetaminophen label-change process while stating that causation was not established and contrary studies existed; ACOG and SMFM publicly differed on the precaution and retained acetaminophen as an appropriate option. The audit treats this as documented disagreement, not proof that a position was politically or commercially dictated.
- Money exposure
- Pooled PDUFA fees fund allowable human-drug-review costs under statutory limits and alongside appropriations; the fees are not paid for a particular decision. FDA/EPA fish advice uses public mercury-surveillance data and technical analysis, and the audit identified no direct industry sponsor or sponsor-driven change.
- Track record
- The topiramate backtest found different rates in FDA's March 2011 notice (1.4%) and July 2011 label (1.2%); the figures have distinct comparisons and remain tied to their source. The 2017 codeine notice recommended against use while breastfeeding, while the later label says breastfeeding is not recommended during treatment, not that it is a formal contraindication. In 2025 FDA said an acetaminophen label-change process had started; the backtest found no neurodevelopment-specific OTC order through October 14, 2026, and the selected product labels had no neurodevelopment warning.
Where this comes from
Incentive exposure describes pressure from money or politics, not whether the source is right. Funding alone does not show influence.