Vitamin E
Vitamin & mineralAlso called ยท 5 namesโพโด
tocopherol, alpha-tocopherol, RRR-alpha-tocopherol, d-alpha-tocopherol, vitamin E supplement
Vitamin supplement
Herbs and supplements are not FDA-approved before sale. About these sources
- Capsule/tablet
- Softgel
Research strength: 3 / 5
MotherToBaby reports vitamin E at the recommended dietary allowance and below the upper limit is not expected to increase birth-defect risk. Primary studies are mixed: Smedts 2009 linked high intake plus supplements with congenital heart defects, while Shaw 2010 found low dietary intake associated with one heart defect; Gilboa 2014 found selected associations without a clear dose-response. MotherToBaby says these reports are not enough to draw conclusions. NIH ODS lists the pregnancy recommended amount at 15 mg/day and the upper limit for vitamin E supplements at 800 mg/day for ages 14 to 18 and 1,000 mg/day from age 19; WHO does not recommend routine vitamin E and C supplements to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes, and Cochrane found no benefit in trials mostly testing combinations. EMA's 2026 review listed pregnancy use as missing information and updated EU medicine labels with a bleeding warning for people with vitamin K deficiency or taking warfarin-like blood thinners. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- MotherToBaby: Vitamin ETeratology service
- Smedts et al., BJOG 2009US government
- Shaw et al., Birth Defects Research A 2010US government
- Gilboa et al., Birth Defects Research A 2014US government
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements: Vitamin E Fact SheetUS government
- WHO recommendations on maternal health, 2nd editionInternational agency
- Cochrane: Vitamin E supplementation in pregnancyResearch review
- EMA/CMDh: Vitamin E product information variation (2026)EU agencyEuropean guidance
Research strength: 3 / 5
MotherToBaby reports vitamin E at the recommended dietary allowance and below the upper limit is not expected to increase birth-defect risk. Primary studies do not identify a separate second-trimester pattern and have mixed findings: Smedts 2009 linked high intake plus supplements with congenital heart defects, Shaw 2010 found low dietary intake associated with one heart defect, and Gilboa 2014 found selected associations without a clear dose-response. MotherToBaby says these reports are not enough to draw conclusions. NIH ODS lists the pregnancy recommended amount at 15 mg/day and the upper limit for vitamin E supplements at 800 mg/day for ages 14 to 18 and 1,000 mg/day from age 19; WHO does not recommend routine vitamin E and C supplements to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes, and Cochrane found no benefit in trials mostly testing combinations. EMA's 2026 review listed pregnancy use as missing information and updated EU medicine labels with a bleeding warning for people with vitamin K deficiency or taking warfarin-like blood thinners. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- MotherToBaby: Vitamin ETeratology service
- Smedts et al., BJOG 2009US government
- Shaw et al., Birth Defects Research A 2010US government
- Gilboa et al., Birth Defects Research A 2014US government
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements: Vitamin E Fact SheetUS government
- WHO recommendations on maternal health, 2nd editionInternational agency
- Cochrane: Vitamin E supplementation in pregnancyResearch review
- EMA/CMDh: Vitamin E product information variation (2026)EU agencyEuropean guidance
Research strength: 3 / 5
MotherToBaby reports vitamin E at the recommended dietary allowance and below the upper limit is not expected to increase birth-defect risk. Primary studies do not identify a separate third-trimester pattern and have mixed findings: Smedts 2009 linked high intake plus supplements with congenital heart defects, Shaw 2010 found low dietary intake associated with one heart defect, and Gilboa 2014 found selected associations without a clear dose-response. MotherToBaby says these reports are not enough to draw conclusions. NIH ODS lists the pregnancy recommended amount at 15 mg/day and the upper limit for vitamin E supplements at 800 mg/day for ages 14 to 18 and 1,000 mg/day from age 19; WHO does not recommend routine vitamin E and C supplements to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes, and Cochrane found no benefit in trials mostly testing combinations. EMA's 2026 review listed pregnancy use as missing information and updated EU medicine labels with a bleeding warning for people with vitamin K deficiency or taking warfarin-like blood thinners. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- MotherToBaby: Vitamin ETeratology service
- Smedts et al., BJOG 2009US government
- Shaw et al., Birth Defects Research A 2010US government
- Gilboa et al., Birth Defects Research A 2014US government
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements: Vitamin E Fact SheetUS government
- WHO recommendations on maternal health, 2nd editionInternational agency
- Cochrane: Vitamin E supplementation in pregnancyResearch review
- EMA/CMDh: Vitamin E product information variation (2026)EU agencyEuropean guidance
Vitamin E โ Breastfeeding
Research strength: 4 / 5
MotherToBaby and LactMed describe vitamin E as a normal part of breast milk, and MotherToBaby says breastfeeding people should continue the recommended amount. LactMed reports higher milk or infant vitamin E levels in some studies using multivitamins, but the infant-level study could not show how much came through milk; these studies measured nutrient levels, not clinical outcomes. LactMed found no published information on clinical effects in breastfed infants by its 2024 revision, while a 2026 review by Prentice describes vitamin E as an exception among fat-soluble vitamins that change with maternal diet or supplements. NIH ODS lists 19 mg/day as the lactation recommended amount and an upper limit for vitamin E supplements of 800 mg/day at ages 14 to 18 or 1,000 mg/day from age 19; EMA's 2026 medicine-label warning covers vitamin K deficiency and warfarin-like blood thinners. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16
Sources
- MotherToBaby: Vitamin ETeratology service
- LactMed: Vitamin EUS government
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements: Vitamin E Fact SheetUS government
- Webb et al., European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2009US government
- Baylin et al., European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005US government
- Prentice, Maternal Nutritional Status and Breastmilk Composition (2026)US government
- EMA/CMDh: Vitamin E product information variation (2026)EU agencyEuropean guidance
Pregnancy
The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements lists a pregnancy RDA of 15 mg/day. Its upper limit for supplemental alpha-tocopherol is 800 mg/day at ages 14 to 18 and 1,000 mg/day from age 19; the upper limit is based on possible bleeding effects and is separate from the amount normally obtained from food. MotherToBaby says intake at the RDA and below the upper limit is not expected to increase birth-defect risk, but the human findings it summarizes are mixed. Smedts et al. (2009) studied 276 case mothers and 324 controls in a Dutch case-control study; higher dietary vitamin E and periconceptional supplements alongside a high dietary intake above 14.9 mg/day were associated with congenital heart defects. Shaw et al. (2010) studied 140 d-transposition of the great arteries cases, 163 tetralogy of Fallot cases, and 698 controls; vitamin supplement use was not associated with either defect, while lower dietary vitamin E was associated with d-transposition but not tetralogy of Fallot. Gilboa et al. (2014), using 8,665 cases and 4,525 controls from the US National Birth Defects Prevention Study, found an association between the third intake quartile and all congenital heart defects (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.35), but the authors noted that selected associations did not show a dose-response pattern of increasing risk with increasing intake. These studies do not establish a consistent dose-response or a separate trimester effect. MotherToBaby says there are no studies suggesting increased miscarriage risk for intakes above the RDA but below the upper limit, and no studies of intake above the upper limit; Boskovic et al. (2005) followed 82 pregnancies exposed to 400 to 1,200 IU/day in the first trimester and found no statistically significant miscarriage difference versus matched controls. This small study does not verify a general absence of risk. For pregnancy outcomes, WHO's 2025 recommendation is against routine combined vitamin E and C supplements to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes, not against ordinary dietary vitamin E. The 2015 Cochrane review included 21 trials with 22,129 women; three trials provided vitamin E alone, but none contributed data, and the analyzed trials tested vitamin E with vitamin C or other agents. In Roberts et al. (2010), 10,154 low-risk nulliparous women were randomized to 1,000 mg vitamin C plus 400 IU vitamin E or placebo; preeclampsia rates were 7.2% and 6.7%, with no significant difference. Newer evidence does not settle the questions. Yang et al. (2025) studied 3,587 pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology; dietary vitamin E was not associated with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, while supplementation above 100 mg/day in early pregnancy was associated with higher odds (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.26). Li et al. (2026) studied 10,824 term deliveries in Wuhan and reported an association between serum vitamin E excess and macrosomia (adjusted OR 1.60); this was a biomarker association, not a randomized supplement effect. Carneiro et al. (2026) pooled six trials with 3,823 pregnant participants: supplementation raised maternal alpha-tocopherol, but no consistent clinical benefit was found for gestational age or birth weight. Stunes et al. (2026) studied 57 pregnant people with overweight or obesity and found measured fat-soluble vitamin levels were not associated with birth weight.
Breastfeeding
MotherToBaby says vitamin E is a normal part of breast milk and lists 19 mg/day as the lactation RDA for adults. LactMed's June 2024 review reports that some supplement studies changed milk or infant vitamin E biomarkers. Webb et al. (2009) randomized 626 HIV-infected Tanzanian women to multi-ingredient regimens; milk alpha-tocopherol was higher in multivitamin groups at 3, 6, and 12 months postpartum, but not at delivery. Baylin et al. (2005) randomized 716 HIV-infected mother-infant pairs in Tanzania to vitamin regimens; infant vitamin E serum levels were higher in multivitamin groups at 6 weeks and 6 months. LactMed notes that the contribution of breast milk to those infant levels could not be determined. These studies measured nutrient levels, not clinical infant outcomes; LactMed found no published information on clinical effects in breastfed infants as of its revision date. Prentice (2026) broadly describes vitamin E as an exception among fat-soluble vitamins A, D, and K that can change with maternal diet or high-dose supplementation. Ali et al. (2026) examined 48 breastfeeding women in Ireland at 4 and 8 weeks postpartum; maternal serum and milk alpha-tocopherol were correlated, but the study did not test an isolated vitamin E intervention or infant health outcomes. These findings do not establish a general clinical benefit from higher-dose supplementation.
Vitamin E is a group of fat-soluble compounds. NIH ODS identifies alpha-tocopherol as the form that meets human requirements. Foods such as seed oils, nuts, seeds, leafy vegetables, and fortified cereals provide vitamin E; supplements commonly provide alpha-tocopherol.
What was tested
Pregnancy evidence includes case-control studies of dietary intake and supplements, a small prospective high-dose exposure study, randomized trials of combined vitamin C and E supplements, and newer observational studies of supplements or blood levels. Most birth-defect findings are observational and do not establish cause. Breastfeeding evidence includes small studies of milk nutrient levels and infant serum nutrient biomarkers, often in HIV-infected Tanzanian populations and with multi-ingredient supplements. No clinical infant-outcome evidence was identified in the LactMed review.
Do different maternal vitamin E intake levels relate to congenital heart defects?
- Source A says
- Smedts 2009 reported an association with higher dietary intake plus supplements, and Gilboa 2014 reported selected associations at higher intake quartiles, including an association with all congenital heart defects at the third quartile. (Smedts et al., BJOG 2009, Gilboa et al., Birth Defects Research A 2014)
- Source B says
- Shaw 2010 found lower dietary vitamin E associated with d-transposition of the great arteries, but not tetralogy of Fallot. MotherToBaby says the opposite-direction reports are not enough to draw conclusions. (Shaw et al., Birth Defects Research A 2010, MotherToBaby: Vitamin E)
- Why they differ
- The studies used different populations, heart-defect types, and exposure measures. Smedts assessed diet and supplement use with a food questionnaire after pregnancy; Shaw examined periconceptional dietary intake and supplement use; Gilboa compared energy-adjusted intake quartiles. Gilboa did not find a pattern of increasing risk with increasing intake.
- Other sources
- NIH ODS lists a pregnancy RDA and a separate supplemental upper limit, but those nutrient reference values do not resolve the conflicting birth-defect findings. (NIH Office of Dietary Supplements: Vitamin E Fact Sheet for Health Professionals)
- What the evidence shows overall
- The primary studies report opposite directions or selected associations without a consistent dose-response. They do not establish a trimester-specific risk from ordinary dietary intake or support changing the compatible rating.
How much does maternal supplementation change vitamin E in breast milk or infant status?
- Source A says
- LactMed summarizes specific studies in which multivitamin supplementation was associated with higher milk alpha-tocopherol or infant serum vitamin E levels; it notes that breast milk's contribution to the infant levels could not be determined. (LactMed: Vitamin E, Webb et al., European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2009, Baylin et al., European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005)
- Source B says
- Prentice 2026 describes vitamin E as an exception among fat-soluble vitamins that change with maternal diet or high-dose supplements. Ali 2026 found a correlation between maternal serum and breastmilk alpha-tocopherol, but did not test a vitamin E supplement intervention. (Prentice, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 2026, Ali et al., Journal of Nutrition 2026)
- Why they differ
- LactMed summarizes particular trials in HIV-infected Tanzanian women using multi-ingredient supplements and short-term postpartum doses. Prentice gives a broad review statement, while Ali studied a small Irish cohort and biomarkers. The studies use different populations, exposures, and time points, and none establishes a clinical infant outcome.
- What the evidence shows overall
- The evidence supports reporting the specific milk and infant biomarker findings with their study limits. It does not support a broad claim that higher daily vitamin E supplements improve infant health or a claim that clinical effects have been ruled out.
- MotherToBaby says people prescribed vitamin E can discuss it with their provider before making changes, and recommends reviewing all supplements and their amounts with a health care provider. (MotherToBaby)
General research, not specific to pregnancy.
NIH ODS reports no identified adverse effects from vitamin E in food, while describing possible clotting effects from high-dose supplements. EMA's 2026 variation adds a medicine-label warning for vitamin K deficiency and vitamin K antagonist blood thinners, as well as overdose instructions.
- NIH ODS says research has not found adverse effects from vitamin E in food, while high-dose alpha-tocopherol supplements can affect coagulation and the upper limits are based on possible hemorrhagic effects. (NIH Office of Dietary Supplements: Vitamin E Fact Sheet for Health Professionals)
- EMA/CMDh says vitamin E medicines may change clotting tests in people with vitamin K deficiency or taking vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants, which may increase bleeding risk; the product information also adds overdose management instructions. (EMA/CMDh: Vitamin E scientific conclusions and product information variation (2026))
- MotherToBaby: Vitamin ETeratology serviceSecondaryPage dated 2024-09-01
- LactMed: Vitamin EUS governmentSecondaryPage dated 2024-06-15
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements: Vitamin E Fact Sheet for Health ProfessionalsUS governmentSecondaryPage dated 2021-03-26
- WHO recommendations on maternal health, second edition (2025)International agencySecondaryPage dated 2025-03-21
- WHO eLENA: Vitamin E supplementation in pregnancy review summaryInternational agencySecondary
- Cochrane: Vitamin E supplementation in pregnancyResearch reviewPrimaryPage dated 2015-09-07Independent check
- Roberts et al., New England Journal of Medicine 2010US governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- EMA PRAC minutes: Vitamin E PSUSA recommendation (June 2026)EU agencySecondaryPage dated 2026-08-31European guidance
- EMA/CMDh: Vitamin E scientific conclusions and product information variation (2026)EU agencySecondaryPage dated 2026-08-04European guidance
- Smedts et al., BJOG 2009US governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Shaw et al., Birth Defects Research A 2010US governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Gilboa et al., Birth Defects Research A 2014US governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Boskovic et al., Reproductive Toxicology 2005US governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Yang et al., Chinese Medical Journal 2025US governmentPrimary
- Li et al., Frontiers in Nutrition 2026US governmentPrimary
- Carneiro et al., Food Science & Nutrition 2026US governmentPrimary
- Stunes et al., Frontiers in Endocrinology 2026US governmentPrimary
- Webb et al., European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2009US governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Baylin et al., European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005US governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Ali et al., Journal of Nutrition 2026US governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Prentice, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 2026US governmentPrimaryIndependent check
Last reviewed 2026-10-16
Independent check 2026-10-16
Not yet clinician-reviewed
Ask your provider about your situation.