Citalopram
MedicationCelexa
SSRI antidepressant
Research strength: 4 / 5
A 2017 citalopram meta-analysis of eight studies found no clear increase in major birth defects, while a Quebec cohort found a higher estimate, so the studies conflict. The Quebec study included only live births and tested many types of defects, so it does not settle whether citalopram caused the difference. MotherToBaby cites a miscarriage study with no increase, but its cited Andersen study examined SSRIs as a group, not citalopram alone. A 2025 UK study found a small miscarriage association across antidepressants, but not among people who continued treatment from before pregnancy; it did not give a citalopram-specific estimate. The Celexa label says available studies have not established an increased risk of major defects or miscarriage. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-14
Sources
- MotherToBaby: Citalopram | EscitalopramTeratology service
- Hong et al., Association of citalopram with congenital anomalies: A meta-analysisUS government
- Bérard et al., Quebec Pregnancy Cohort malformation analysisUS government
- Andersen et al., SSRI exposure and miscarriageUS government
- Martin et al., First trimester antidepressant use and miscarriageUS government
- DailyMed: Celexa current labelDrug company label
Research strength: 3 / 5
MotherToBaby says some studies link citalopram or escitalopram use throughout pregnancy with preterm birth or lower birth weight, while noting that depression can also affect these outcomes. A 2026 study of antidepressants as a group found stillbirth rates of 0.34% in unexposed pregnancies and 0.40% in exposed pregnancies; the link was weaker among mothers with depression or anxiety. The study did not report citalopram-specific stillbirth estimates, but it reported a citalopram association with small-for-gestational-age birth. A 2024 analysis of worldwide reports found a citalopram stillbirth reporting signal, but it cannot estimate incidence or show cause. The Celexa label warns of possible PPHN after SSRI exposure, while a large 2015 study found adjusted results varied by the definition used and were class-level. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-14
Sources
- MotherToBaby: Citalopram | EscitalopramTeratology service
- Martin et al., Birth outcomes in the UK, Norway, and SwedenUS government
- Desaunay et al., Antidepressants and fetal death in WHO VigiBaseUS government
- Malm et al., Finnish SSRI pregnancy cohortUS government
- DailyMed: Celexa current labelDrug company label
- Huybrechts et al., Antidepressant use late in pregnancy and PPHNUS government
Research strength: 4 / 5
The Celexa label warns that late SSRI exposure may be linked with PPHN, poor newborn adaptation, and postpartum hemorrhage; its newborn warnings apply to the SSRI class, not a citalopram-specific estimate. A 2024 study of term infants found delayed adaptation in 11.2% of those with late SSRI exposure and 4.4% of unexposed infants, and its citalopram subgroup also showed higher adjusted odds. A 2013 US cohort found postpartum hemorrhage in 4.0% of current serotonin-reuptake inhibitor users and 2.8% of depressed nonusers; the study reported associations for individual SSRIs, including citalopram, but could not rule out other factors. MotherToBaby reports that most newborn symptoms are mild and settle within a few weeks, though some babies need extra nursery care. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-14
Sources
- DailyMed: Celexa current labelDrug company label
- MotherToBaby: Citalopram | EscitalopramTeratology service
- Cornet et al., Delayed neonatal adaptation after SSRI exposureUS government
- Sivojelezova et al., Citalopram use in pregnancyUS government
- Palmsten et al., Antidepressants near delivery and postpartum hemorrhage
Citalopram — Breastfeeding
Research strength: 4 / 5
NHS guidance says citalopram passes into breast milk in small amounts, and LactMed reports low infant blood levels in some babies. In a small 2002 study, infant levels were very low or not detectable and child development was reported as normal through one year. A 2004 study reported adverse events in 3 of 31 citalopram-exposed infants, 0 of 12 infants whose mothers had depression but did not take citalopram, and 1 of 31 healthy controls; the group difference was not significant. A 2024 milk study included 13 citalopram pairs and found no detectable infant plasma level in 9 of them. LactMed says citalopram need not prompt stopping breastfeeding when it is needed, while NHS SPS advises caution and infant monitoring. Ask your provider about your situation.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-14
Sources
- NHS: CitalopramUK government
- LactMed: CitalopramUS government
- Heikkinen et al., Citalopram pregnancy and lactation studyUS government
- Lee et al., Citalopram adverse events during breastfeedingUS government
- Den Besten-Bertholee et al., Antidepressants in lactationUS government
- NHS SPS: Using SSRI antidepressants during breastfeedingUK government
Pregnancy
Citalopram-specific malformation evidence conflicts. The 2017 meta-analysis included eight studies and 1,507,896 participants; the pooled odds ratio for major malformations was 1.07 (95% CI 0.98-1.17), and the pooled cardiac estimate was 1.31 (0.88-1.93), falling to 1.03 (0.84-1.26) after excluding an outlier. The 2017 Quebec Pregnancy Cohort included 18,487 depressed or anxious pregnancies ending in live singleton births and reported a citalopram aOR of 1.36 (1.08-1.73) for major malformations, with 88 exposed cases; its organ-specific comparisons included musculoskeletal defects and craniosynostosis. The cohort's live-birth restriction and multiple comparisons, along with the meta-analysis's heterogeneous observational studies, limit interpretation. The Quebec paper disclosed a lead-author consulting role as an expert for plaintiffs in antidepressant litigation. MotherToBaby's miscarriage statement is not verified as citalopram-specific by its cited Andersen 2014 study. Andersen analyzed SSRIs as a class: among 22,884 first-trimester SSRI exposures in 1,279,840 pregnancies, the adjusted miscarriage HR was 1.27 (1.22-1.33); people who stopped SSRIs before pregnancy also had an elevated HR of 1.24 (1.18-1.30). Martin et al. 2025 analyzed 1,021,384 UK pregnancies and 73,540 first-trimester antidepressant prescriptions; the adjusted HR was 1.04 (1.02-1.06), with adjusted absolute estimates of 13.1% without and 13.6% with prescriptions. Among people prescribed before pregnancy and continuing into trimester one, the aHR was 1.00 (0.98-1.03). These are class-level estimates, not citalopram-specific results. The 2024 VigiBase analysis found a citalopram disproportionality signal for fetal death, but spontaneous reports have no exposure denominator and cannot provide incidence. Its abstract does not verify MotherToBaby's seven-case count. A 2026 cohort across the UK, Norway, and Sweden reported class-level stillbirth and preterm associations; the adjusted stillbirth estimates were 0.34% in unexposed and 0.40% in exposed pregnancies, attenuating to aOR 1.07 (0.94-1.21) among mothers with depression or anxiety. The authors omitted drug-specific stillbirth estimates for privacy. The same article qualitatively associated citalopram with small-for-gestational-age birth. The exact citalopram estimate from its supplement was not checked and is not stated. A 2026 Finnish cohort compared SSRI users with people diagnosed with depression who did not use antidepressants and reported lower risks of some preterm and low-birth-weight outcomes, but higher low Apgar, breathing-problem, and neonatal-care-unit outcomes. These are SSRI-class results and use a different comparator. For PPHN, the Celexa label states that risks exist with SSRI exposure, including Celexa, and the label also notes risks associated with untreated depression. Huybrechts et al. 2015 studied 3,789,330 Medicaid pregnancies. Crude PPHN rates were 31.5 per 10,000 SSRI-exposed births and 20.8 per 10,000 unexposed births; after restricting to women with depression and high-dimensional propensity adjustment, the SSRI OR was 1.10 (0.94-1.29). In the primary-PPHN analysis, the adjusted SSRI OR was 1.28 (1.01-1.64). This is class-level evidence, not a citalopram-specific estimate. EMA's March 2022 signal addressed pulmonary hypertension generally; in September 2022 PRAC said evidence was insufficient to establish a causal association for new or worsening pulmonary hypertension. It should not be described as a citalopram-specific PPHN finding. Cornet et al. 2024 studied 280,090 term infants, including 7,573 exposed to an SSRI after 20 weeks. Delayed neonatal adaptation occurred in 11.2% of exposed and 4.4% of unexposed infants; the adjusted OR was 2.14 (1.96-2.32). The citalopram monotherapy subgroup included 825 infants and had an aOR of 2.29 (1.91-2.76). Sivojelezova et al. 2005 prospectively compared 132 citalopram-exposed pregnancies with disease-matched and unexposed groups; 125 participants used citalopram in at least the first trimester. Near-term citalopram exposure was associated with special-care nursery admission (RR 4.2, 1.71-10.26), but the cohort was small. For maternal postpartum hemorrhage, the Celexa label says SSRI exposure, particularly in the month before delivery, was associated with a less-than-two-fold increase in observational studies. Palmsten et al. 2013 studied 106,000 Medicaid pregnancies with mood or anxiety disorder. Current serotonin reuptake inhibitor users had PPH in 4.0% versus 2.8% among depressed nonusers; the adjusted class estimate was RR 1.47 (1.33-1.62). The paper reports that all individual SSRIs available for analysis, including citalopram, were associated, but the 4.0% rate is class-level and residual confounding could not be ruled out.
Breastfeeding
MotherToBaby and LactMed report low transfer of citalopram into milk and low infant serum levels in most published cases, with isolated reports of drowsiness, fussiness, irritability, restlessness, feeding difficulty, or weight change. LactMed advises monitoring for excess sleepiness, restlessness, irritability, poor feeding, and poor weight gain, especially in younger infants. Heikkinen et al. 2002 enrolled 11 mothers taking citalopram and their infants, with 10 matched controls. Infant plasma concentrations were very low or undetectable despite citalopram being measurable in milk, and infant development was reported as normal through one year. Lee et al. 2004 compared 31 breastfeeding mothers taking citalopram, 12 depressed untreated mothers, and 31 healthy controls; infant adverse-event counts were 3/31, 0/12, and 1/31, with no statistically significant difference. Den Besten-Bertholee et al. 2024 included 37 mother-infant pairs, 13 exposed to citalopram; infant citalopram plasma levels were undetectable in 9 of the 13 citalopram-exposed infants. These studies provide direct exposure data but have small citalopram samples. Heinonen et al. 2025 followed 97 children whose mothers used SSRIs during pregnancy; 22 were exposed to SSRIs through breastfeeding, but only 2 were exposed to citalopram. Adjusted IQ scores did not differ significantly between breastfed children with and without postnatal SSRI exposure. The study is not a citalopram-specific long-term estimate. The 2026 NeoWISE cohort examined feeding mode among newborns exposed to SSRIs in utero, not citalopram transfer through milk, so it is not used to infer a citalopram-specific breastfeeding effect. LactMed says citalopram, when needed, is not by itself a reason to discontinue breastfeeding, while NHS SPS advises caution, lists sertraline or paroxetine as preferred, and recommends infant monitoring. NHS public guidance says citalopram can be used while breastfeeding and passes into milk in small amounts. This is a difference in guidance emphasis; the primary citalopram studies are small and do not resolve rare or long-term outcomes.
Citalopram is an SSRI. The Celexa label says its mechanism is unclear but is presumed to involve increased serotonergic activity in the central nervous system through inhibition of serotonin reuptake. The current brand label identifies Celexa as citalopram hydrobromide.
What was tested
Pregnancy evidence includes citalopram-specific case-control and cohort studies, a citalopram malformation meta-analysis, SSRI-class miscarriage and PPHN cohorts, spontaneous-report analyses, and recent population cohorts. The Quebec malformation cohort used depressed or anxious live-birth controls; the 2025 UK miscarriage study compared first-trimester antidepressant prescriptions with no prescriptions; the 2026 Finland cohort compared SSRI users with diagnosed-depression nonusers and discontinuers; the 2026 UK/Norway/Sweden cohort used prescriptions or dispensations and sibling/paternal negative controls. Cornet et al. studied term infants and defined delayed neonatal adaptation using Apgar score, resuscitation, or neonatal intensive-care admission for respiratory support. Palmsten et al. used Medicaid dispensing records around delivery and postpartum-hemorrhage diagnoses. Breastfeeding evidence includes milk and plasma concentration studies, small prospective infant cohorts, case reports, and one small study of later cognitive testing. Heikkinen, Lee, and Den Besten-Bertholee provide direct citalopram exposure information; Heinonen's later-child analysis is predominantly other SSRIs. These designs cannot establish rare harms or isolate medication effects from all differences between treated and untreated families.
Citalopram-specific major malformations
- Source A says
- The 2017 meta-analysis found no statistically clear increase in major malformations overall (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98-1.17). (Hong et al., Association of citalopram with congenital anomalies: A meta-analysis)
- Source B says
- The Quebec cohort reported a higher citalopram estimate (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08-1.73; 88 exposed cases). (Bérard et al., Quebec Pregnancy Cohort malformation analysis)
- Why they differ
- The meta-analysis pooled heterogeneous observational studies. The Quebec study used depressed or anxious live-birth controls and tested multiple organ-specific outcomes, which can increase the chance of findings from multiple comparisons. The populations and designs are not identical.
- What the evidence shows overall
- Both findings are reported without selecting one as definitive. The data support uncertainty about a possible citalopram-specific increase; they do not establish a cause.
Miscarriage estimates
- Source A says
- MotherToBaby states that a citalopram and escitalopram study did not find an increased chance of miscarriage. (MotherToBaby: Citalopram | Escitalopram)
- Source B says
- The cited Andersen study found an elevated SSRI-class estimate, and the 2025 UK study found a small antidepressant-class association; neither reports a citalopram-specific estimate. (Andersen et al., Exposure to SSRIs in early pregnancy and miscarriage, Martin et al., First trimester antidepressant use and miscarriage)
- Why they differ
- The secondary page describes the result as citalopram and escitalopram specific, while the linked Andersen paper analyzes SSRIs as a class. The 2025 cohort analyzes antidepressants as a class and uses different exposure definitions.
- What the evidence shows overall
- The citalopram-specific miscarriage claim is not verified by the cited primary study. Class-level results are summarized as class-level and do not establish a citalopram-specific effect.
Preterm birth and fetal growth
- Source A says
- MotherToBaby reports that some studies associate citalopram or escitalopram use throughout pregnancy with preterm birth and low birth weight; the 2026 cross-national cohort found class-level associations and a qualitative citalopram association with small-for-gestational-age birth. (MotherToBaby: Citalopram | Escitalopram, Martin et al., Birth outcomes in the UK, Norway, and Sweden)
- Source B says
- The 2026 Finnish SSRI cohort, using diagnosed-depression nonusers as a comparator, reported lower risks of some preterm and low-birth-weight outcomes among SSRI users. (Malm et al., Finnish SSRI pregnancy cohort)
- Why they differ
- The studies use different populations, exposure definitions, drug groups, and comparators. The Finland paper is class-level and its depression-diagnosed comparator differs from the cross-national study's primary comparison.
- What the evidence shows overall
- The observed directions differ across studies. The available results do not establish a citalopram-specific causal effect on preterm birth or fetal growth.
Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn
- Source A says
- The Celexa label warns of PPHN risk with SSRI exposure, including Celexa. (DailyMed: Celexa current label, pregnancy section)
- Source B says
- Huybrechts et al. found the adjusted SSRI estimate was 1.10 (95% CI 0.94-1.29) for the broad PPHN definition and 1.28 (1.01-1.64) for primary PPHN. (Huybrechts et al., Antidepressant use late in pregnancy and PPHN)
- Why they differ
- The study estimates are SSRI-class results, and the result changes with the outcome definition and confounder adjustment. The label describes a class warning rather than a citalopram-specific risk estimate.
- What the evidence shows overall
- The label warning remains, but the primary study does not give a citalopram-specific estimate and the adjusted class-level evidence is definition-sensitive. The EMA 2022 PH signal was not specific to PPHN.
Breastfeeding guidance
- Source A says
- LactMed says that citalopram, if required, is not by itself a reason to discontinue breastfeeding. (LactMed: Citalopram)
- Source B says
- NHS SPS advises caution, prefers sertraline or paroxetine, and lists infant monitoring; NHS public guidance says citalopram may be used while breastfeeding if needed. (NHS SPS: Using SSRI antidepressants during breastfeeding, NHS: Citalopram)
- Why they differ
- LactMed emphasizes not changing an effective medicine solely because of breastfeeding, while NHS SPS discusses preferred options and precautionary monitoring. The wording differs in emphasis and does not establish different measured infant outcomes.
- What the evidence shows overall
- The evidence supports individualized guidance and monitoring; the direct citalopram studies are small and do not settle rare or long-term outcomes.
Later child outcomes
- Source A says
- The 2026 Wales cohort reported citalopram-only associations with special educational needs, including a 2.1-per-100 marginal effect in the group with a recorded maternal depression diagnosis. (McIlvride et al., Prenatal depression, antidepressants, and school-age outcomes in Wales)
- Source B says
- The 2026 SSRI cognition meta-analysis found no significant difference in pooled general cognition, language, or psychomotor scores. (Ali et al., Cognitive effects of prenatal SSRI exposure: systematic review and meta-analysis)
- Why they differ
- The Wales study measured administrative school-age special educational needs and reported a citalopram-only analysis. The meta-analysis pooled standardized early development tests across SSRIs and did not include the later Wales study. The outcomes, ages, exposure windows, and medication specificity differ.
- What the evidence shows overall
- These results are not direct contradictions. The Wales association is observational and the authors note possible confounding by depression severity; the meta-analysis does not rule out every school-age outcome.
US public discussion and professional guidance in 2025-2026
- Source A says
- FDA hosted a July 2025 expert-panel event about SSRIs and pregnancy; the event page is not a new FDA safety conclusion or label change. (FDA: Expert panel event on SSRIs and pregnancy, FDA: Drug Safety Communications index)
- Source B says
- ACOG criticized the panel's balance, SMFM strongly supported SSRI treatment during pregnancy, and APA called for individualized clinical treatment. (ACOG statement on the benefit of access to SSRIs during pregnancy, SMFM statement on SSRI antidepressants for treating depression during pregnancy, APA letter to FDA on the SSRI pregnancy panel)
- Why they differ
- A public expert-panel event and professional-society responses differ in framing but do not constitute opposing formal FDA guidance. FDA's citizen-petition correspondence was procedural and did not implement the requested label changes.
- Other sources
- FDA acknowledged the petition as a procedural filing in November 2025 and stated in May 2026 that the issues remained unresolved and required extensive review. (FDA acknowledgment of Public Citizen SRI petition, FDA interim response to Public Citizen SRI petition)
- What the evidence shows overall
- No new pregnancy-specific FDA warning update or relevant Drug Safety Communication was identified by the audit cutoff. The current Celexa record is version 40 effective 18 Aug 2026, while the relevant pregnancy and bleeding sections show an effective date of 9 Oct 2023. The professional statements do not warrant a rating change under R1.
- MotherToBaby says to talk with healthcare providers before changing how citalopram is taken; if stopping is planned, a provider may suggest lowering the dose gradually. (MotherToBaby: Citalopram | Escitalopram)
- The NHS says citalopram can be used during pregnancy if needed and that the lowest possible effective dose may be prescribed. (NHS: Citalopram)
- MotherToBaby says the healthcare team should know about citalopram use so newborn symptoms can be assessed and cared for if they occur. (MotherToBaby: Citalopram | Escitalopram)
- LactMed and NHS SPS describe monitoring for sleepiness, restlessness or irritability, feeding problems, and weight gain in breastfed infants. (LactMed: Citalopram and NHS SPS: Using SSRI antidepressants during breastfeeding)
General research, not specific to pregnancy.
The Celexa label indicates the medicine for major depressive disorder in adults and reports adverse reactions seen in trials. It does not establish a citalopram-specific cause for the pregnancy or infant associations described above.
- Celexa is indicated for treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. (DailyMed: Celexa current label, indications and common adverse reactions)
- Table 3 reports nausea, dry mouth, somnolence, insomnia, increased sweating, tremor, diarrhea, and ejaculation disorder among adverse reactions in adult trials. (DailyMed: Celexa current label, indications and common adverse reactions)
- The Celexa label describes its mechanism as unclear but presumed to involve inhibition of serotonin reuptake in the central nervous system. (DailyMed: Celexa current label, mechanism of action)
- MotherToBaby: Citalopram | EscitalopramTeratology serviceSecondary
- LactMed: CitalopramUS governmentSecondaryPage dated 2026-09-15
- DailyMed: Celexa current label, pregnancy sectionDrug company labelTertiaryPage dated 2026-08-18
- NHS: CitalopramUK governmentSecondaryPage dated 2026-06-26Independent check
- NHS SPS: Using SSRI antidepressants during breastfeedingUK governmentSecondaryPage dated 2023-11-17Independent check
- Hong et al., Association of citalopram with congenital anomalies: A meta-analysisUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Bérard et al., Quebec Pregnancy Cohort malformation analysisUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Andersen et al., Exposure to SSRIs in early pregnancy and miscarriageUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Martin et al., First trimester antidepressant use and miscarriageUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Desaunay et al., Antidepressants and fetal death in WHO VigiBaseUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Martin et al., Birth outcomes in the UK, Norway, and SwedenUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Malm et al., Finnish SSRI pregnancy cohortUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Huybrechts et al., Antidepressant use late in pregnancy and PPHNUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Cornet et al., Delayed neonatal adaptation after SSRI exposureUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Sivojelezova et al., Citalopram use in pregnancyUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Palmsten et al., Antidepressants near delivery and postpartum hemorrhagePrimaryIndependent check
- Heikkinen et al., Citalopram during pregnancy and lactationUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Lee et al., Citalopram adverse events during breastfeedingUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Den Besten-Bertholee et al., Antidepressants in lactationUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Heinonen et al., Cognitive outcomes after SSRI exposure through breast milkUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- McIlvride et al., Prenatal depression, antidepressants, and school-age outcomes in WalesUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- Ali et al., Cognitive effects of prenatal SSRI exposure: systematic review and meta-analysisUS governmentPrimaryIndependent check
- FDA: Expert panel event on SSRIs and pregnancyUS governmentSecondaryPage dated 2025-07-23
- FDA: Drug Safety Communications indexUS governmentSecondary
- ACOG statement on the benefit of access to SSRIs during pregnancyProfessional societySecondaryPage dated 2025-07-21Independent check
- SMFM statement on SSRI antidepressants for treating depression during pregnancyProfessional societySecondaryPage dated 2025-07-23Independent check
- APA letter to FDA on the SSRI pregnancy panelSecondaryPage dated 2025-07-25Independent check
- FDA acknowledgment of Public Citizen SRI petitionSecondaryPage dated 2025-11-17
- FDA interim response to Public Citizen SRI petitionSecondaryPage dated 2026-05-11
- EMA PRAC minutes, 7-10 March 2022, pulmonary hypertension signalEU agencySecondaryPage dated 2022-10-31European guidance
- EMA PRAC minutes, 26-29 September 2022, pulmonary hypertension follow-upEU agencySecondaryPage dated 2023-02-01Independent checkEuropean guidance
Last reviewed 2026-10-14
Independent check 2026-10-14
Not yet clinician-reviewed
Ask your provider about your situation.